Skip to main content

Android Pay

As some of you may recall, I had the great good fortune to be asked to interview Spencer X from Google on the main stage at Money 2020 Europe in Copenhagen.

Before I go on to what was discussed, let me first just go on record to sat what a great guy Spencer is. We discussed the general area of questions, but we did not discuss specific questions and we didn't rehearse any questions or answers. As a result, the interaction was interesting and lively and got great feedback from the delegates. I think companies and speakers can often benefit greatly from being a little less scripted at an event like this, so thanks to Spencer and Google for a great discussion. Oh, and for my VIP ticket to the Rudimental party in the evening. I'd never had a "Moscow Mule" before, and now I won't drink anything else.

The reason that Spencer was in town was that AndroidPay is launching in Europe, starting with the UK. What most people in the audience were interested in was whether Google would charge the same “toll” to issuing banks as Apple does. 

“We’re certainly not tolling the issuing banks, we are not going to toll the merchants who are already under enormous pressure. Android needs to be best in class, it’s really very simple. Payments has to work and it has to work seamlessly.”

From Android Pay to expand into Europe ‘soon’ - Mobile Banking

The answer was no, and I assume it is because Google benefits from the data associated with the payment so the relatively minor toll that they could extract for the payment is nothing compared to being able to link purchases to searches and that sort of thing. Anyway, Spencer covered a whole bunch of interesting as aspects of AndroidPay to give us some indication of where it might go in the future.

A trial in the Bay Area involving 50 small businesses and 50  McDonald’s restaurants is allowing Google to hide payments in the background of retail transactions. It’s called Handsfree, it was announced at Google’s developer conference last month, and while this technology is admittedly in its “early days” as Spinnell puts it, it’s indicative of a future we’re heading toward where your identity matters more than your phone.

From Money20/20 Europe: Android Pay Handsfree is Easier Than Tapping

His main point, if I remember correctly, when challenged as to AndroidPay’s competitive positioning against the other “xPays” was that AndroidPay would be open. They intended to compete on APIs and SDKs and by exposing the AndroidPay functionality so that innovative developers can build on top of it. I was thinking about this because of a couple of discussions I’ve been in with clients recently about making the transition from selling propositions directly to customers to selling propositions to the developers who develop the customer propositions. Switching from persuading customers to use your service to persuading developers to use your service is hard. As I’m sure you’ll appreciate, it’s not just a matter of hanging out an API and hoping.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We could fix mobile security, you know. We don't, but we could

Earlier in the week I blogged about mobile banking security , and I said that in design terms it is best to assume that the internet is in the hands of your enemies. In case you think I was exaggerating… The thieves also provided “free” wireless connections in public places to secretly mine users’ personal information. From Gone in minutes: Chinese cybertheft gangs mine smartphones for bank card data | South China Morning Post Personally, I always use an SSL VPN when connected by wifi (even at home!) but I doubt that most people would ever go to this trouble or take the time to configure a VPN and such like. Anyway, the point is that the internet isn’t secure. And actually SMS isn’t much better, which is why it shouldn’t really be used for securing anything as important as home banking. The report also described how gangs stole mobile security codes – which banks automatically send to card holders’ registered mobile phones to verify online transactions – by using either a Trojan...

Financial Cryptography: Corda Day - a new force

Forum friend Ian Grigg, who I always take very seriously indeed on any such topic, wrote about Corda on his blog and concluded with a powerful statement. Bitcoin told the users it wanted an unstoppable currency - sure, works for a small group but not for the mass market. Ethereum told their users they need an unstoppable machine - which worked how spectacularly with the DAO? Not. What. We. Wanted. Corda is the only game in town because it's the only one that asked the users. It's that simple. From Financial Cryptography: Corda Day - a new force xxx It seems to me, however, what Ian is pointing to as the greatest strength of their approach is also the greatest weakness. A staple feature of unimaginative management consultants presentations about innovation is some variation on the statement by Henry Ford that if you had asked users what they wanted, they would have asked for faster horses coupled with some variation on the statement by Steve jobs that it was pointless ask...

Barclays slated after CIO takes a year to open a bank account

xxx The rigorous KYC procedures at US banks the New Jersey-based crime ring created more than 7,000 fake identities to get tens of thousands of credit cards From  Woman Gets 3 Years for Role in $200M Credit Card Fraud Scam - ABC News xxx xxxx Barclays slated after CIO takes a year to open a bank account : "An adviser to a new charitable incorporated organisation that spent more than a year trying to open a bank account has blasted Barclays for its onerous demands and disproportionate due diligence." xxx In a recent survey for VocaLink, some two-thirds of respondents said that they saw value in the establishment of a central KYC utility. They are wrong. We don’t need a central KYC utility, we need a federated reputation infrastructure. Or, to put it another way, a financial services passport ( as I mentioned earlier in the year ).