Skip to main content

Financial Cryptography: Corda Day - a new force

Forum friend Ian Grigg, who I always take very seriously indeed on any such topic, wrote about Corda on his blog and concluded with a powerful statement.

Bitcoin told the users it wanted an unstoppable currency - sure, works for a small group but not for the mass market. Ethereum told their users they need an unstoppable machine - which worked how spectacularly with the DAO? Not. What. We. Wanted.

Corda is the only game in town because it's the only one that asked the users. It's that simple.

From Financial Cryptography: Corda Day - a new force

xxx

It seems to me, however, what Ian is pointing to as the greatest strength of their approach is also the greatest weakness. A staple feature of unimaginative management consultants presentations about innovation is some variation on the statement by Henry Ford that if you had asked users what they wanted, they would have asked for faster horses coupled with some variation on the statement by Steve jobs that it was pointless asking users what they wanted, you just have to show them. In the context of the disruptive innovation analysis that we have all is a fair criticism of our 3 to say that they have been caught between two stools. On the one hand, their members want them to solve for problems that they already have in a context that they understand. Hence they want quarter to, essentially, emulate the kind of database solution that they are familiar with, potentially with some cost savings and some improved performance. But the more I think about it, and I think about it a lot, my experiences working with senior management teams in a variety of industries to help them to develop their strategies towards the general class a shares latest technologies and the specific technology of the block chain is that this new technology will have an impact not by making marginal improvements to the way in which markets function at present but by stimulating the creation of, in these new kinds of markets, the control transparency of transactions will have the most impact. This is why keep going on and on about ambient accountability.

 

I think am coming round to the point of view that block chain is a ragtag, not a thin tech.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

new survey results from USA Technologies (USAT) suggest. The payments technology company, which enables electronic payments for self-service machines, compared consumer spending activity at 35 of its vending machines in urban areas with a high concentration of iPhone users between week one and week four of the installation of new digital signage promoting Apple Pay. Consumers made more contactless purchases: The vending machine providers saw an average contactless transaction revenue increase of 89%, implying that consumers are making more mobile payments. This was likely driven by the clear advertisement of Apple Pay. Total transactions increased: Consumers made more purchases overall. This was probably driven by an uptick in mobile payments, given the major increase in contactless transaction revenue. And the vending machines may have attracted many first-time users who were drawn in by the digital advertising of Apple Pay. Boosting awareness is key to unlocking pent-up demand amon...
Post a Comment
Read more

David | LinkedIn

Alex Todd rather kindly called this a “most lucid explanation of digital identity management” I would highly recommend this presentation to anyone interested in understanding prospective blockchain based identity architectures From David | LinkedIn This is very kind, but as I said in the link, this is thinking out loud and far from a fully-developed solution. We’re working on parts of this for different clients and I can see that there is something there - a genuinely new way of solving some old problems - but it’s early days.
Post a Comment
Read more