Skip to main content

New Blockchain Partnership Proposes Solution for Remote Voting - CryptoCoinsNews

The news that somewhere in South Korea some sort of local government had some sort of election and recorded the votes on some sort of blockchain restarted some discussions about whether electronic voting might be just around the corner. As I have often suggested, the idea of using smartphones instead of ballot papers seems rather obvious.

With a sample ballot on their smartphone a voter will only need to bring their phone with them when the polls open;

[From New Blockchain Partnership Proposes Solution for Remote Voting - CryptoCoinsNews]

Great. But hold on...

it’s projected that through an app built on the blockchain voters won’t have to make the trip to polls in the future.

[From New Blockchain Partnership Proposes Solution for Remote Voting - CryptoCoinsNews]

Oh dear. This sort of system might be acceptable for shareholder voting and that sort of thing, but it certainly isn’t acceptable for either local or national government elections for a variety of reasons all of which have been reiterated endlessly on this very blog (principal among them the issue of voter intimidation). I am firmly of the opinion that voting should be a public act.

That doesn’t mean, however, that new technology cannot make a very big difference to the electoral process. Just to illustrate on sensible use of blockchain technology in this context, imagine a voting system whereby the elector authenticates access to a private key and is returned a cryptographically-blinded permission to vote. They go down to the polling both a tap their phone or bluetooth or QR or whatever to communicate their vote. Then they choose their candidate. Let’s say they vote for President Camacho. When they get home they can log in to traverse the election block chain and they can see if their vote has indeed ended up in the right bucket. In fact, they can see every vote in every vote (although they don’t know who those votes came from).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

new survey results from USA Technologies (USAT) suggest. The payments technology company, which enables electronic payments for self-service machines, compared consumer spending activity at 35 of its vending machines in urban areas with a high concentration of iPhone users between week one and week four of the installation of new digital signage promoting Apple Pay. Consumers made more contactless purchases: The vending machine providers saw an average contactless transaction revenue increase of 89%, implying that consumers are making more mobile payments. This was likely driven by the clear advertisement of Apple Pay. Total transactions increased: Consumers made more purchases overall. This was probably driven by an uptick in mobile payments, given the major increase in contactless transaction revenue. And the vending machines may have attracted many first-time users who were drawn in by the digital advertising of Apple Pay. Boosting awareness is key to unlocking pent-up demand amon...

David | LinkedIn

Alex Todd rather kindly called this a “most lucid explanation of digital identity management” I would highly recommend this presentation to anyone interested in understanding prospective blockchain based identity architectures From David | LinkedIn This is very kind, but as I said in the link, this is thinking out loud and far from a fully-developed solution. We’re working on parts of this for different clients and I can see that there is something there - a genuinely new way of solving some old problems - but it’s early days.

Financial Cryptography: Corda Day - a new force

Forum friend Ian Grigg, who I always take very seriously indeed on any such topic, wrote about Corda on his blog and concluded with a powerful statement. Bitcoin told the users it wanted an unstoppable currency - sure, works for a small group but not for the mass market. Ethereum told their users they need an unstoppable machine - which worked how spectacularly with the DAO? Not. What. We. Wanted. Corda is the only game in town because it's the only one that asked the users. It's that simple. From Financial Cryptography: Corda Day - a new force xxx It seems to me, however, what Ian is pointing to as the greatest strength of their approach is also the greatest weakness. A staple feature of unimaginative management consultants presentations about innovation is some variation on the statement by Henry Ford that if you had asked users what they wanted, they would have asked for faster horses coupled with some variation on the statement by Steve jobs that it was pointless ask...