Skip to main content

Blueprint for KYC data sharing in the UK

xxx

The UK's Payment Strategy Forum has delivered a blueprint for the future of the nation's payment system, setting out design and implementation approaches for the construction of a new 'National Payments Architecture'.

From PSF lays down blueprint for new UK payments architecture

xxx

Since publishing our Strategy, we have reviewed the approach and agreed on the following detriments as focus areas for the proposed data sharing framework:

  1. Inclusion of bad actors: Obtaining sufficient KYC information to identify bad actors requires the use of multiple external data sources and systems during on-boarding and ongoing due diligence. Incomplete, in-accurate or out-of-date SME customer data hinders the detection of bad actors.

  2. Poor customer experience for good actors: Limited data sharing among the PSPs and other sectors such as utilities and telecommunication providers lead to significant duplication of effort if a customer moves to another provider or extends their products. data hinders the detection of bad actors.

  3. Barrier for small PSPs: Privileged access to SME data can be viewed as a barrier for small and new entrants, narrowing access and weakening competition. data hinders the detection of bad actors.

  4. Inefficiency in the SME KYC process: Customer identification processes can be complex, protracted, and expensive, despite not being a key competitive differentiator for PSPs and providers in other sectors. data hinders the detection of bad actors.

  5. Lack of trust: The fear of fraudulent actors potentially being able to penetrate the digital environment and get access to customer data leads to an erosion of trust in society.data hinders the detection of bad actors.

The plan is to start with SMEs. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There is no excuse for not taking cards

So we went to the pub. For lunch. Seven of us. Say £20 per head. £100+ quid. Say £50 quid gross for the pub. Colleague goes to order food and drinks and pay at the bar. Apologetic barmaid comes over to explain that their “card machine” is down, so she can only accept cash. Under normal circumstances I would have simply walked out, feeling it wholly inappropriate to reward such a poorly managed establishment and, as a functioning actor in a capitalist economy, done my duty to depress their lunchtime takings. Here’s what we wanted to say: This is absurd. This is 2016 not 1916. Your card machine is down? Well, so what! Are you seriously telling me that mein host has no mobile phone number capable of registering for PingIt or PayM? That none of the staff or the pub itself have a PayPal account that I can send the money to? That neither the owners nor managers not contingency planners thought to tuck an iZettle behind the bar to use when the clunky and expensive GPRS terminal fails for o...