Skip to main content

Virtual shared ledger made real

A few years ago, along with colleagues at Consult Hyperion, I was looking at the potential for the blockchain in the identity space.

(Put to one side what is meant by blockchain and what is meant by identity.)

One of the ideas that came out at that time was to record the create, read, update and delete (CRUD) operations on the virtual identities (personas, if you like, each containing an identifier and credentials) in a virtual shared ledger (VSL, aka the “CRUDchain") and then anchor the VSL in one or more actual shared ledgers, including one or more public blockchains.

As it turned out, no-one was much interested in this idea. Three years ago I took it to the Dutch Blockchain Innovation Conference in Amsterdam. Here are a couple of diagrams from that presentation. First here’s the CRUDchain...

And here is the idea of gathering the CRUDchain transactions and putting them on the blockchain. 

Of course, what I envisaged those CRUD transactions operating on were public key certificates rather than W3C decentralised identifiers (DIDs) but you get the general point.When you want to prove to  a web site that you are over 18, you point them to an entry the CRUDchain contains the relevant credential. This entry (whether a PKC or DID) contains a public key. The web site generates a challenge using this key: only you can answer the challenge because you are the only person with the corresponding private key. Therefore the web site can be sure that you are the holder of the credential. It all works.

Hence I was interested to note Microsoft’s Consensus 2019 announcement that they intend to implement something along these lines, as adumbrated in their October 2018 white paper on Decentralized Identity. They are creating an Identity Overlay Network (ION) using the Sidekeep protocol. This project uses IFPS to manage the CRUD entries at scale and Microsoft intend, in the short term at least, to anchor these transactions in the Bitcoin blockchain which is, as the respected cryptographer Ari Juels (a professor at Cornell and former chief scientist at RSA) said in Wired magazine, “surprising”. If the approach gains transaction, however, I’m sure they will use other shared ledgers.

As Microsoft put it in their blog post on the topic, "All nodes of the network are able to arrive at the same Decentralized Public Key Infrastructure (DPKI) state for an identifier based solely on applying deterministic protocol rules to chronologically ordered batches of operations anchored on the blockchain, which ION nodes replicate and store via IPFS”. In this architecture, you don’t use “the blockchain” to store personal information, you use it to prove the ordering of identity transactions elsewhere. If I’ve understood things correctly, they key point is this: the public blockchain is used as a verification platform, not as a transaction platform. And I think that makes sense.

What’s probably most important about the Microsoft approach is the integration with Active Directory. If anything is a step towards corporates accepting some new identity service (whether decentralised, self-sovereign or anything else) it is this integration. It’s first step, but an important step.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

new survey results from USA Technologies (USAT) suggest. The payments technology company, which enables electronic payments for self-service machines, compared consumer spending activity at 35 of its vending machines in urban areas with a high concentration of iPhone users between week one and week four of the installation of new digital signage promoting Apple Pay. Consumers made more contactless purchases: The vending machine providers saw an average contactless transaction revenue increase of 89%, implying that consumers are making more mobile payments. This was likely driven by the clear advertisement of Apple Pay. Total transactions increased: Consumers made more purchases overall. This was probably driven by an uptick in mobile payments, given the major increase in contactless transaction revenue. And the vending machines may have attracted many first-time users who were drawn in by the digital advertising of Apple Pay. Boosting awareness is key to unlocking pent-up demand amon...

David | LinkedIn

Alex Todd rather kindly called this a “most lucid explanation of digital identity management” I would highly recommend this presentation to anyone interested in understanding prospective blockchain based identity architectures From David | LinkedIn This is very kind, but as I said in the link, this is thinking out loud and far from a fully-developed solution. We’re working on parts of this for different clients and I can see that there is something there - a genuinely new way of solving some old problems - but it’s early days.

We could fix mobile security, you know. We don't, but we could

Earlier in the week I blogged about mobile banking security , and I said that in design terms it is best to assume that the internet is in the hands of your enemies. In case you think I was exaggerating… The thieves also provided “free” wireless connections in public places to secretly mine users’ personal information. From Gone in minutes: Chinese cybertheft gangs mine smartphones for bank card data | South China Morning Post Personally, I always use an SSL VPN when connected by wifi (even at home!) but I doubt that most people would ever go to this trouble or take the time to configure a VPN and such like. Anyway, the point is that the internet isn’t secure. And actually SMS isn’t much better, which is why it shouldn’t really be used for securing anything as important as home banking. The report also described how gangs stole mobile security codes – which banks automatically send to card holders’ registered mobile phones to verify online transactions – by using either a Trojan...