Skip to main content

New, revised paperback edition of Before Babylon, Beyond Bitcoin is published!

 

The new, revised paperback edition of Before Babylon, Beyond Bitcoin has been published by the London Publishing Partnership. Here is the foreword by Andrew Haldane of the Bank of England:

Often, the most interesting issues in economics arise from the intersection—sometimes the collision—between technology and society. To take an example, there is no more topical, and vexed, an economic issue right now than the impact of new technol- ogies (such as robots, artificial intelligence and big data) on the world of work (individuals, sectors, communities, societies). Indeed, history makes clear that this creative friction between technology and work has existed for many millennia. Money is another issue that, through the ages, has illustrated vividly this complex tango between societies and technologies. Money is a technology—indeed, a key one for discharging obligations between people, for keeping score in the economy, for facilitating trade, finance and commerce. But money is also a social good—indeed, a key one as an emblem of civic identity, as a measure of societal trust and order.

Technology and society have, in the main, operated in harmony when it comes to monetary issues. As money technologies have improved, this has tended to enhance trust in money, thereby boosting its supply and enhancing its public good properties in society. For example, one of the most transformative shifts in monetary technologies was from commodity to fiat monies. This not only freed up resources for more productive uses but over time enhanced the attractiveness of money. But new monetary technologies have not always been trust boosting, certainly not immediately. Indeed, in the hands of the wrong government or private entrepreneur, some money technologies have been trust busting. Some of the relative tranquillity in fiat monies over recent centuries can probably be put down to the stabilizing role of central banks.

Now a new technological wave may be about to break over money. For some, this could herald a completely new monetary epoch —perhaps one where money is fully digital rather than physical, where the structures that engender trust in money are distributed rather than centralized—where central banks' role is changed fundamentally or even circumvented. This issue is shaping up to be every bit as vexed as those of robots and jobs. Passions around cashless societies run high. If nothing else, this tells us that money is, always has been and always will be much more than a cryptographic code; it is a social convention. Old conventions tend to change slowly. And it is society, rather than technology, that tends to choose the destination.

This book by David Birch brings out in rich and lucid detail the full historical journey money has been undertaking and the technological revolutions it has encountered en route. More speculatively, it also sketches the possible contours of future monetary paths, given the possibility of transformative technological change. Historical scholars, technologists, monetary economists and policy makers will all find something in here to hold their attention, to reshape their view of history or technology, finance or policy. They may or may not agree on what the next chapter in the history of money holds. But this book provides a well-researched and engaging account of the story so far, of money in retrospect and money in prospect.

Andrew Haldane
Chief Economist and Executive Director for Monetary Analysis, Research and Statistics
Member of the Monetary Policy Committee
Bank of England

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Financial Cryptography: Corda Day - a new force

Forum friend Ian Grigg, who I always take very seriously indeed on any such topic, wrote about Corda on his blog and concluded with a powerful statement. Bitcoin told the users it wanted an unstoppable currency - sure, works for a small group but not for the mass market. Ethereum told their users they need an unstoppable machine - which worked how spectacularly with the DAO? Not. What. We. Wanted. Corda is the only game in town because it's the only one that asked the users. It's that simple. From Financial Cryptography: Corda Day - a new force xxx It seems to me, however, what Ian is pointing to as the greatest strength of their approach is also the greatest weakness. A staple feature of unimaginative management consultants presentations about innovation is some variation on the statement by Henry Ford that if you had asked users what they wanted, they would have asked for faster horses coupled with some variation on the statement by Steve jobs that it was pointless ask...

There is no excuse for not taking cards

So we went to the pub. For lunch. Seven of us. Say £20 per head. £100+ quid. Say £50 quid gross for the pub. Colleague goes to order food and drinks and pay at the bar. Apologetic barmaid comes over to explain that their “card machine” is down, so she can only accept cash. Under normal circumstances I would have simply walked out, feeling it wholly inappropriate to reward such a poorly managed establishment and, as a functioning actor in a capitalist economy, done my duty to depress their lunchtime takings. Here’s what we wanted to say: This is absurd. This is 2016 not 1916. Your card machine is down? Well, so what! Are you seriously telling me that mein host has no mobile phone number capable of registering for PingIt or PayM? That none of the staff or the pub itself have a PayPal account that I can send the money to? That neither the owners nor managers not contingency planners thought to tuck an iZettle behind the bar to use when the clunky and expensive GPRS terminal fails for o...

We could fix mobile security, you know. We don't, but we could

Earlier in the week I blogged about mobile banking security , and I said that in design terms it is best to assume that the internet is in the hands of your enemies. In case you think I was exaggerating… The thieves also provided “free” wireless connections in public places to secretly mine users’ personal information. From Gone in minutes: Chinese cybertheft gangs mine smartphones for bank card data | South China Morning Post Personally, I always use an SSL VPN when connected by wifi (even at home!) but I doubt that most people would ever go to this trouble or take the time to configure a VPN and such like. Anyway, the point is that the internet isn’t secure. And actually SMS isn’t much better, which is why it shouldn’t really be used for securing anything as important as home banking. The report also described how gangs stole mobile security codes – which banks automatically send to card holders’ registered mobile phones to verify online transactions – by using either a Trojan...