Skip to main content

Will anyone take responsibility for rising financial fraud? | Financial Times

xxx

What is more likely - 1. a hacker takes the time and effort to gain entry to this specific individual's email account in the hope that one day they would one day carry out a very large transfer or 2. a hacker targets a conveyancing firm, knowing that they handle a large volume of high value transfers regularly and probably don't have the best security/outdated protection from a spoof attack?

From Will anyone take responsibility for rising financial fraud? | Financial Times.

xxx

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There is no excuse for not taking cards

So we went to the pub. For lunch. Seven of us. Say £20 per head. £100+ quid. Say £50 quid gross for the pub. Colleague goes to order food and drinks and pay at the bar. Apologetic barmaid comes over to explain that their “card machine” is down, so she can only accept cash. Under normal circumstances I would have simply walked out, feeling it wholly inappropriate to reward such a poorly managed establishment and, as a functioning actor in a capitalist economy, done my duty to depress their lunchtime takings. Here’s what we wanted to say: This is absurd. This is 2016 not 1916. Your card machine is down? Well, so what! Are you seriously telling me that mein host has no mobile phone number capable of registering for PingIt or PayM? That none of the staff or the pub itself have a PayPal account that I can send the money to? That neither the owners nor managers not contingency planners thought to tuck an iZettle behind the bar to use when the clunky and expensive GPRS terminal fails for o...