Skip to main content

Post-functional money and VAT

I genuinely did not know this, having never been to either of the noted lap-dancing clubs Secrets or Platinum Lace, but such establishments require customers to buy vouchers, a private currency, to pay the dancers. The dancers do not, as you might expect in the modern world, accept credit cards (even contactless fnar fnar).

The customers are charged an entirely reasonable commission on the exchange of fiat currencies for the private currency. Presumably there are safety and security issues that drive the use of the private currency but I do remember reading about problems that occur in transactions of a similar context where the recipient, generally a marginalised woman, is presented with a collapsing currency (eg, Sterling) and cannot be sure of the value and therefore whether to accept the cash of note.

Anyway, for whatever reason, there is a private currency is circulation. As a result, the clubs are in a dispute with HM Revenue & Customs over whether they should pay VAT on the commission they charge for exchanging customers’ cash for vouchers to pay dancers. The clubs believe this commission, about 20%, is a financial transaction and so should be exempt from VAT. HMRC thinks differently.

(Wait, what? 20%? Are they using my agent?)

This story is an interesting example of the use of what you might call "company money". It’s akin to the use of chips in casinos or Disney Dollars. You change fiat currency that is good anywhere into a form of electronic money that is useful in only one area.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We could fix mobile security, you know. We don't, but we could

Earlier in the week I blogged about mobile banking security , and I said that in design terms it is best to assume that the internet is in the hands of your enemies. In case you think I was exaggerating… The thieves also provided “free” wireless connections in public places to secretly mine users’ personal information. From Gone in minutes: Chinese cybertheft gangs mine smartphones for bank card data | South China Morning Post Personally, I always use an SSL VPN when connected by wifi (even at home!) but I doubt that most people would ever go to this trouble or take the time to configure a VPN and such like. Anyway, the point is that the internet isn’t secure. And actually SMS isn’t much better, which is why it shouldn’t really be used for securing anything as important as home banking. The report also described how gangs stole mobile security codes – which banks automatically send to card holders’ registered mobile phones to verify online transactions – by using either a Trojan...